The head of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), General Michael Langley, has stirred controversy after accusing Burkina Faso’s President, Captain Ibrahim Traoré, of misusing the country’s gold reserves for personal protection rather than serving the interests of its citizens.
Speaking before the U.S. Senate on April 3, General Langley directly criticized Traoré’s leadership, alleging that the gold — one of Burkina Faso’s most valuable national assets — was being diverted for selfish purposes. His comments come amid wider concerns about political instability across West Africa, where a wave of military coups has toppled elected governments in countries like Burkina Faso, Mali, Guinea, and Niger.
Langley painted a grim picture of the region, blaming deep-rooted corruption, stalled development, and fragile democratic institutions for the turmoil. However, his sharp rhetoric has drawn unease among Africans at home and abroad, many of whom see troubling echoes of past U.S. interventions that disregarded national sovereignty under the banner of promoting stability.
Also, read: Namibian Minister Fired After Allegations of Rape, Kidnapping, and Attempted Bribery
While Langley spoke of complex challenges facing West Africa, his tone was notably stern, and for many observers, his accusations signaled more than concern — they hinted at potential U.S. interference. Comparisons to past U.S. military actions, such as the invasion of Iraq, are already circulating, raising fears that Africa could once again become a playground for foreign powers under the guise of fighting corruption and terrorism.
Critics point out that Langley’s testimony made little mention of African-led solutions or genuine partnership. Instead, it reinforced the perception that Washington is positioning itself to dictate terms to African nations whose leaders defy Western expectations.
The allegations against President Traoré are serious, and they land at a sensitive time for Burkina Faso, a country grappling with jihadist violence, humanitarian crises, and growing internal discontent. But as history shows, foreign intervention rarely solves such deep-rooted issues — and often leaves even greater instability in its wake.
As General Langley’s comments continue to reverberate, the bigger question remains: will this moment spark meaningful change led by Africans themselves, or will it open the door to another era of heavy-handed foreign involvement on the continent?
