The recent controversy surrounding former Miss South Africa finalist Chidimma Adetshina has taken a concerning turn. The Department of Home Affairs’ Portfolio Committee has disclosed that two officials are currently under investigation for their alleged involvement in a fraudulent birth registration tied to Chidimma’s mother. The investigation has drawn widespread attention, raising questions about Chidimma’s citizenship and whether she is being unfairly targeted.
The allegations stem from events that date back almost three decades. In 1995, Chidimma’s mother applied for her ID in Tshwane but faced complications when she was instructed to collect it from Joburg, a location she never applied in. Years later, after giving birth in 2001, she discovered that a child had already been registered under her ID number—her daughter, Chidimma.
Despite facing prolonged bureaucratic hurdles, she was eventually issued a new ID number, enabling her to officially register her child’s birth. However, this twist has cast doubts on the validity of Chidimma’s citizenship, which is now being questioned by authorities.
The Department of Home Affairs has launched a comprehensive investigation, focusing on three officials suspected of being involved in the irregular birth registration. While one of these officials has since passed away, the two remaining suspects are currently under scrutiny. The department, in collaboration with the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks), is leaving no stone unturned.
Advocate Constance Moitse, head of the department’s counter-corruption unit, confirmed the investigation’s progress, stating, “We are moving closer to determining the truth, but this matter is complex and requires careful examination. We are also exploring the legal implications this could have on Chidimma’s citizenship status.”
Also, read; Libya Central Bank Suspends Operations After Kidnapping of Director
The potential cancellation of Chidimma’s mother’s identity documents could result in Chidimma’s birth registration being declared fraudulent. Should this happen, her current citizenship status would be jeopardized.
Although Chidimma could apply for citizenship under Section 43 of the Birth Registration Act, her situation is complicated by the involvement of potentially fraudulent documentation. The law was likely not designed to address such cases, leaving room for uncertainty and legal debate.
A representative from the department highlighted this uncertainty: “If her mother’s identity is invalidated, it calls into question whether Chidimma’s status can be legally upheld. There’s also the concern that she could become stateless if her citizenship is revoked, especially if no alternative nationality is established.”
While the investigation continues, Chidimma remains in limbo, her reputation clouded by the accusations against her family. Supporters argue that she is being unfairly victimized by circumstances outside her control. With the truth still contested and the case far from resolved, questions linger: Is this a matter of genuine fraud, or is Chidimma a victim of a deeply flawed system? Only time—and the outcome of this investigation—will tell.
